Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6328

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:25 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > El 4 mar 2021, a las 13:12, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:13 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> El 4 mar 2021, a las 11:49, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:57 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas
> >>> <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> >>>> +               BCM6328_MUX_LO_REG,
> >>>> +               BCM6328_MUX_HI_REG,
> >>>
> >>>> +               BCM6328_MUX_OTHER_REG
> >>>
> >>> When it's not terminator add a comma, otherwise remove a comma.
> >
> >> … so you want me to add a comma or not?
> >
> > Hmm... you tell me! If this is a list which covers all possible cases
> > _and_ the last one is the kinda maximum value (aka terminator), then
> > comma is not needed, otherwise add it (to me feels like the latter
> > should be done here).
>
> Well… Then it shouldn’t be needed, since this is a list which covers all possible cases and the last one is a terminator.

Honestly the name suggests otherwise. And looking into the code there
is no guarantee you won't split that _OTHER_ area to something with
new compatible hardware.
Renaming to BCM6328_MUX_MAX_REG will clear that this is terminator,
but it means its value shouldn't be used except as to understand the
amount of supported registers of this enumerator.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko