Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:17 PM Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/02/2021 14:53:01+0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:45 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >> > > > the Microsemi/Microchip Serial GPIO device is present only Microsemi >> > > > VCore III and Microchip Sparx5 SoCs. Hence add a dependency on >> > > > ARCH_SPARX5 || SOC_VCOREIII, to prevent asking the user about this >> > > > driver when configuring a kernel without support for these SoCs. >> > > > >> > > > Fixes: 7e5ea974e61c8dd0 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Add pinctrl driver for Microsemi Serial GPIO") >> > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > > --- >> > > > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 4 ++-- >> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > > >> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig >> > > > index 113073d5f89bbf70..3b75b1d7d3d1f1b0 100644 >> > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig >> > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig >> > > > @@ -353,8 +353,8 @@ config PINCTRL_OCELOT >> > > > >> > > > config PINCTRL_MICROCHIP_SGPIO >> > > > bool "Pinctrl driver for Microsemi/Microchip Serial GPIO" >> > > > - depends on OF >> > > > - depends on HAS_IOMEM >> > > > + depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM >> > > > + depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || SOC_VCOREIII || COMPILE_TEST >> > > > select GPIOLIB >> > > > select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP >> > > > select GENERIC_PINCONF >> > > >> > > Thank you for your patch. Unfortunately, it makes it impossible to use >> > > the driver across PCIe - which is a specifically desired configuration. >> > > >> > > Could you add CONFIG_PCI to the || chain? >> > >> > Sure. >> > >> > Is PCIe the only other transport over which the register can be accessed? >> > Or can this also be done over e.g. SPI, like on Ocelot[1]? >> > >> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20200511145329.GV34497@xxxxxxxxx/ >> > >> >> Yes, this driver IP is also available on Ocelot (this is SOC_VCOREIII) >> so this is also available over SPI. > > Hence would you consider > > depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || SOC_VCOREIII || PCI || SPI || COMPILE_TEST > > acceptable? Or would that be futile, as must systems have PCI and/or > SPI enabled anyway? > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert Yes, that would be fine, but as you say - not have a lot of impact. Up to you... ---Lars -- Lars Povlsen, Microchip