On Tuesday, 9 February 2021 15:46:19 MSK Andy Shevchenko wrote: >On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:35 PM Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Monday, 8 February 2021 16:20:17 MSK Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Nikita Shubin >> >> <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >... > >> >> +static void ep93xx_init_irq_chip(struct device *dev, struct >> >> irq_chip >> >> *ic, const char *label) +{ >> >> >> >> + ic->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "gpio-irq-%s", >> >> label); >> > >> >Is the label being NULL okay? You mean ENOMEM should be honored ? I think you are right about it. >> >> The label is taken from ep93xx_gpio_banks[], so unless we explicitly >> pass zero to ep93xx_init_irq_chip(), we are ok. > >Maybe I was unclear, let me rephrase: Is the *resulting* label being >NULL okay? >> >> + ic->irq_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack; >> >> + ic->irq_mask_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask_ack; >> >> + ic->irq_mask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask; >> >> + ic->irq_unmask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_unmask; >> >> + ic->irq_set_type = ep93xx_gpio_irq_type; >> >> +}