Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi gpiochips

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Andy.

On Monday, 8 February 2021 16:20:17 MSK Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Nikita Shubin 
<nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Fixes the following warnings which results in interrupts disabled on
>> port B/F:
>> 
>> gpio gpiochip1: (B): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple
>> gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip5: (F): detected
>> irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the
>> driver.
>> 
>> - added separate irqchip for each interrupt capable gpiochip
>> - provided unique names for each irqchip
>
>...
>
>> +static void ep93xx_init_irq_chip(struct device *dev, struct irq_chip
>> *ic, const char *label) +{
>> 
>> +       ic->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "gpio-irq-%s",
>> label);
>Is the label being NULL okay?

The label is taken from ep93xx_gpio_banks[], so unless we explicitly 
pass zero to ep93xx_init_irq_chip(), we are ok.

>
>> +       ic->irq_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack;
>> +       ic->irq_mask_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask_ack;
>> +       ic->irq_mask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask;
>> +       ic->irq_unmask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_unmask;
>> +       ic->irq_set_type = ep93xx_gpio_irq_type;
>> +}
>
>...
>
>> -               girq->chip = &ep93xx_gpio_irq_chip;
>
>I don't see where you remove that static structure.

Good catch - thank you very much, also i noticed that i forgot to switch 
IRQ chip in irq_set_chip_and_handler() for port F.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux