Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: fix use-after-free in sunxi_pmx_free()

["liu xiang" <liu.xiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:40 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:29:08PM +0800, Liu Xiang wrote:
> > When CONFIG_REGULATOR is not set, sunxi_pmx_request() always return
> > success. Even a group of pins call sunxi_pmx_request(), the refcount
> > is only 1. This can cause a use-after-free warning in sunxi_pmx_free().
> > To solve this problem, go to err path if regulator_get() return NULL
> > or error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Is there any drawback to depending on CONFIG_REGULATOR?
>
> Given that we need those regulators enabled anyway, I guess we could
> just select or depends on it
> 
> I agree.
> 
> Liu can you make a patch to Kconfig to just select REGULATOR?
> Possibly even the specific regulator driver this SoC is using
> if it is very specific for this purpose.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

I found that the regulator driver is related to the specific board, not the SoC.
There is no board config for ARM64 SoC like ARM.
Is a good idea to select the regulator driver in the pinctrl Konfig? Or just 
select CONFIG_REGULATOR_FIXED_VOLTAGE to avoid the use-after-free warning?