On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:40 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:29:08PM +0800, Liu Xiang wrote: > > When CONFIG_REGULATOR is not set, sunxi_pmx_request() always return > > success. Even a group of pins call sunxi_pmx_request(), the refcount > > is only 1. This can cause a use-after-free warning in sunxi_pmx_free(). > > To solve this problem, go to err path if regulator_get() return NULL > > or error. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Is there any drawback to depending on CONFIG_REGULATOR? > > Given that we need those regulators enabled anyway, I guess we could > just select or depends on it I agree. Liu can you make a patch to Kconfig to just select REGULATOR? Possibly even the specific regulator driver this SoC is using if it is very specific for this purpose. Yours, Linus Walleij