On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:01:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 10:44 PM Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Patch note: > > > This may seem trivial but I found myself coming up with series of pipes > > > in the shell just so I could see the function selector in line with the > > > function names. At first, I thought I could just pipe to 'cat -n' but > > > that counts at offset 1 instead of 0. > > > > SO advises [1] to use `nl -v0` instead. > > Neat! That is a nice utility to remember. I feel bad now for piping to > perl to solve the problem :) > > I know this is rather trivial change but I think does seem to make sense > to print the function selector along with the function name. I'm not against the patch. Simply learning shell together :) > > > The only downside I can see to > > > this patch would be if someone is depending on the existing format but > > > I don't believe that is a concern for debugfs, right? > > > > Debugfs is not an ABI. > > > > [1]: https://superuser.com/a/1433656/415970 -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko