Re: [PATCH] drivers/pinctrl/bcm: Simplify bool comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/15/2021 2:09 AM, Jiapeng Zhong wrote:
> Fix the follow coccicheck warnings:
> 
> ./drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-ns2-mux.c:856:29-38: WARNING:
> Comparison to bool.
> 

Sorry I must be missing something here. Why is there a warning while
'pull_up' and 'pull_down' are already of type 'bool' and compared to
'false'?

> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Zhong <abaci-bugfix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-ns2-mux.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-ns2-mux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-ns2-mux.c
> index 57044ab..0fe4a1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-ns2-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-ns2-mux.c
> @@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ static int ns2_pin_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
>  	switch (param) {
>  	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
>  		ns2_pin_get_pull(pctldev, pin, &pull_up, &pull_down);
> -		if ((pull_up == false) && (pull_down == false))
> +		if (!pull_up && !pull_down)


Looks fine as improvement, but I'm curious why there's a warning to
start with.

Thanks,

Ray

>  			return 0;
>  		else
>  			return -EINVAL;
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux