On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:24 PM Adam Lackorzynski <adam@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 0 is not a proper IRQ number and also indicates failure. Hmm... While in this case it's perhaps okay, this does not work in general since the function can take irq_base == 0 and realloc == true. So if we want to have a code that somebody may reuse better not to do this (we never get 0 from this function). In my humble opinion NAK. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko