Re: [PATCH 5/6] gpiolib: Fix return check of __irq_domain_alloc_irqs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon Jan 04, 2021 at 14:57:31 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 6:59 PM Adam Lackorzynski <adam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > 0 is not a proper IRQ number and also indicates failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Lackorzynski <adam@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > index b02cc2abd3b6..9667e1a62626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ static void gpiochip_set_hierarchical_irqchip(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> >                                                       &fwspec,
> >                                                       false,
> >                                                       NULL);
> > -                       if (ret < 0) {
> > +                       if (ret <= 0) {
> >                                 chip_err(gc,
> >                                          "can not allocate irq for GPIO line %d parent hwirq %d in hierarchy domain: %d\n",
> >                                          i, parent_hwirq,
> > --
> > 2.30.0.rc2
> >
> 
> Does this commit depend in any way on others in this series or can I
> apply it directly for fixes?

It is independent, you can directly apply it.


Thanks, Adam



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux