On 03.12.20 23:35, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2020-12-03 20:00, schrieb Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult: >> On 02.12.20 15:15, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>>> + bufwalk = name_buffer; >>>> + >>>> + while (idx < priv->num_gpios && >>>> + bufwalk < (name_buffer+cf.names_size)) { >>>> + gpio_names[idx] = (strlen(bufwalk) ? bufwalk >>>> : NULL); >>>> + bufwalk += strlen(bufwalk)+1; >>>> + idx++; >>> >>> >>> Something's wrong with indentation here. >> >> i dont think so: the "bufwalk ..." line belongs to the while expression >> and is right under the "idx", as it should be. I didn't want to break up >> at the "<" operator. shall i do this instead ? > > Or don't break the lines at all. Both lines don't add up to more than > 100 chars, > right? IIRC checkpatch complains at 80 chars. Has that been changed ? --mtx -- --- Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu. --- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287