Re: [PATCH 13/18] ipu3-cio2: Add functionality allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:35:51PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:24PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

...

> > +/*
> > + * Extend this array with ACPI Hardware ID's of devices known to be working.
> > + * Do not add a HID for a sensor that is not actually supported.
> > + */
> > +static const char * const cio2_supported_devices[] = {
> > +	"INT33BE",
> > +	"OVTI2680",
> 
> I guess we don't have the known-good frequencies for the CSI-2 bus in
> firmware?
> 
> One option would be to put there what the drivers currently use. This
> assumes the support for these devices is, well, somewhat opportunistic but
> I guess there's no way around that right now at least.
> 
> As the systems are laptops, they're likely somewhat less prone to EMI
> issues to begin with than mobile phones anyway.

ACPI has only XTAL clock frequency (dunno if it's the same as CSI-2 bus clock).
Currently it may be one out of 19.2 MHz, 24 MHz (with a remark that all sensors
must use same value as PMIC can't produce several clocks).

> > +};

...

> > +	strcpy(sensor->prop_names.clock_frequency, "clock-frequency");
> > +	strcpy(sensor->prop_names.rotation, "rotation");
> > +	strcpy(sensor->prop_names.bus_type, "bus-type");
> > +	strcpy(sensor->prop_names.data_lanes, "data-lanes");
> > +	strcpy(sensor->prop_names.remote_endpoint, "remote-endpoint");
> 
> Please use the actual field size instead with strncpy / strscpy.

Perhaps Laurent's proposal is better?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko