On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:53:31PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > We may use BIT() macro to increase readability in > acpi_gpio_adr_space_handler(). > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > index 31008b0aef77..b9c3140cbd6d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > @@ -1097,8 +1097,7 @@ acpi_gpio_adr_space_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address address, > mutex_unlock(&achip->conn_lock); > > if (function == ACPI_WRITE) > - gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep(desc, > - !!((1 << i) & *value)); > + gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep(desc, !!(*value & BIT(i))); Nit: Here I would use a helper variable to make it (much) more readable. Anyway, Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>