Re: [libgpiod] cxx bindings: time_point vs duration

[Jack Winch <sunt.un.morcov@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Why would that be a shame? We have the chance to rework the API of the
> entire package, I want to give ourselves some time to get it right
> before we carve anything in stone for an indefinite period of time.
> There's no rush, really.

You're right. :)

I will start the talk with you next week regarding ABI compatibility.
I'll give you a rundown of the issues, the potential solutions and we
will discuss the usage of libgpiod and the C++ bindings.

Jack

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:56 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jack Winch <sunt.un.morcov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > > I also don't envision making a libgpiod
> > > v2.0 release any earlier than that so we have plenty of time to
> > > discuss it and come to the right conclusion.
> >
> >
> > That is also a shame, but at least that gives some time to undertake
> > further review of libgpiod v2.0 and potentially make some further
> > improvements.  What's the time window for this?
> >
>
> Why would that be a shame? We have the chance to rework the API of the
> entire package, I want to give ourselves some time to get it right
> before we carve anything in stone for an indefinite period of time.
> There's no rush, really.
>
> Bartosz