Re: [libgpiod] cxx bindings: time_point vs duration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Jack: FYI the clock configuration didn't make it this merge window so
> it'll be released in v5.11.


Ah, that is a shame.  Such is life, though.

> I also don't envision making a libgpiod
> v2.0 release any earlier than that so we have plenty of time to
> discuss it and come to the right conclusion.


That is also a shame, but at least that gives some time to undertake
further review of libgpiod v2.0 and potentially make some further
improvements.  What's the time window for this?

Jack


On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:36 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:09 AM Jack Winch <sunt.un.morcov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > What I did not want to see happen is the change as currently proposed
> > be applied and cause issues in the future.
> >
>
> Jack: FYI the clock configuration didn't make it this merge window so
> it'll be released in v5.11. I also don't envision making a libgpiod
> v2.0 release any earlier than that so we have plenty of time to
> discuss it and come to the right conclusion.
>
> Bartosz
>
> [snip]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux