On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 3:26 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add a new version of the uAPI to address existing 32/64-bit alignment > issues, add support for debounce and event sequence numbers, allow > requested lines with different configurations, and provide some future > proofing by adding padding reserved for future use. > > The alignment issue relates to the gpioevent_data, which packs to different > sizes on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms. That creates problems for 32-bit apps > running on 64-bit kernels. uAPI v2 addresses that particular issue, and > the problem more generally, by adding pad fields that explicitly pad > structs out to 64-bit boundaries, so they will pack to the same size now, > and even if some of the reserved padding is used for __u64 fields in the > future. > > The new structs have been analysed with pahole to ensure that they > are sized as expected and contain no implicit padding. > > The lack of future proofing in v1 makes it impossible to, for example, > add the debounce feature that is included in v2. > The future proofing is addressed by providing configurable attributes in > line config and reserved padding in all structs for future features. > Specifically, the line request, config, info, info_changed and event > structs receive updated versions and new ioctls. > > As the majority of the structs and ioctls were being replaced, it is > opportune to rework some of the other aspects of the uAPI: > > v1 has three different flags fields, each with their own separate > bit definitions. In v2 that is collapsed to one - gpio_v2_line_flag. > > The handle and event requests are merged into a single request, the line > request, as the two requests were mostly the same other than the edge > detection provided by event requests. As a byproduct, the v2 uAPI allows > for multiple lines producing edge events on the same line handle. > This is a new capability as v1 only supports a single line in an event > request. > > As a consequence, there are now only two types of file handle to be > concerned with, the chip and the line, and it is clearer which ioctls > apply to which type of handle. > > There is also some minor renaming of fields for consistency compared to > their v1 counterparts, e.g. offset rather than lineoffset or line_offset, > and consumer rather than consumer_label. > > Additionally, v1 GPIOHANDLES_MAX becomes GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX in v2 for > clarity, and the gpiohandle_data __u8 array becomes a bitmap in > gpio_v2_line_values. > > The v2 uAPI is mostly a reorganisation and extension of v1, so userspace > code, particularly libgpiod, should readily port to it. > > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> > --- This now looks good for me. Just a small nit below. Andy: would you mind taking a look as well? > > +/* > + * Maximum number of requested lines. > + * > + * Must be no greater than 64 as bitmaps are limited to 64-bits, and a > + * multiple of 2 to ensure 32/64-bit alignment of structs. > + */ > +#define GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX 64 > + If we refer to bitmaps for which helpers are defined in include/linux/bitmap.h then they're not limited to 64-bits. I'd just say here that we want to fit into 64-bit integers for simplicity. [snip] Bartosz