On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:02:14AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:39 AM Bjorn Andersson > <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > @Linus, we started off with something similar for GPIOs and ended up > > with the logic in the core code. Should we somehow try to do the same > > for pinctrl? > > msm_pingroup_is_valid() looks very reusable but I'm afraid I do not > understand the implicit assumptions around it, but I guess yes, > if it can be properly documented etc. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Hi Bjorn, Can you please help guide further on this ? we can validate group using request calls similar to pinmux_ops here. -Mayank
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Mayank Grover <groverm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:56:00 +0530
- In-reply-to: <CACRpkdbSsVcy=6Bo42SnPqgKoa+jNanmBEXix_yv6aNK8VcreQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <1589817025-21886-1-git-send-email-groverm@codeaurora.org> <20200519013813.GU2165@builder.lan> <CACRpkdbSsVcy=6Bo42SnPqgKoa+jNanmBEXix_yv6aNK8VcreQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Mayank Grover
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Bjorn Andersson
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: Fix pin being driven low for a while on gpiod_get(..., GPIOD_OUT_HIGH)
- Next by Date: [PATCH] pinctrl: sirf: add missing put_device() in error handling path in sirfsoc_gpio_probe()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- Next by thread: [gpio:fixes] BUILD SUCCESS e75dfba311f478f1c2bf928284e1949c20594336
- Index(es):
 |