On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:39 AM Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @Linus, we started off with something similar for GPIOs and ended up > with the logic in the core code. Should we somehow try to do the same > for pinctrl? msm_pingroup_is_valid() looks very reusable but I'm afraid I do not understand the implicit assumptions around it, but I guess yes, if it can be properly documented etc. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 11:02:14 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20200519013813.GU2165@builder.lan>
- References: <1589817025-21886-1-git-send-email-groverm@codeaurora.org> <20200519013813.GU2165@builder.lan>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Mayank Grover
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Mayank Grover
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- From: Bjorn Andersson
- [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: serial: xr_serial: Add gpiochip support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Call acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() on GPIO chip de-registration
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add check for pinctrl group is valid
- Index(es):
 |