On 11/05/2020 13:39:42+0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:47 PM Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 07/05/2020 14:27:06+0200, Lars Povlsen wrote: > > > Alexandre Belloni writes: > > > > On 07/05/2020 13:40:15+0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > >> The Microsemi Ocelot pin controller is only present on Microsemi Ocelot > > > >> and Jaguar2 SoCs. Add a platform dependency to the PINCTRL_OCELOT > > > >> config symbol, to avoid asking the user about it when configuring a > > > >> kernel without Ocelot or Jaguar2 support. > > > >> > > > > > > > > I have to NAK here because there are upcoming (hopefully this cycle) > > > > SoCs using this driver. > > > > > > Not only because of that, but also an arbitrary system connecting to > > > ocelot by PCI could be using the driver. > > > > Right, and that was why I removed the dependency when adding jaguar2 > > That is far from obvious from the description of commit da801ab56ad87489 > ("pinctrl: ocelot: add MSCC Jaguar2 support").... > BTW, probably PINCTRL_OCELOT should have got "default y if MSCC_OCELOT", > to avoid breaking old configs? > > > support I never booted the mips core of jaguar2, I used it using PCIe. > > Ah, you're using it as a PCIe endpoint. So what about ... > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >> --- > > > >> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >> > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig > > > >> index f0ce4ce3e0f52456..bed67c08a0892240 100644 > > > >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig > > > >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig > > > >> @@ -394,8 +394,8 @@ config PINCTRL_RK805 > > > >> > > > >> config PINCTRL_OCELOT > > > >> bool "Pinctrl driver for the Microsemi Ocelot and Jaguar2 SoCs" > > > >> - depends on OF > > > >> - depends on HAS_IOMEM > > > >> + depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM > > > >> + depends on MSCC_OCELOT || COMPILE_TEST > > ... "depends on MSCC_OCELOT || PCI || COMPILE_TEST" instead? > > If other SoCs gain support, the dependency list can be extended. > Hum ok, note that it can also be connected as a SPI slave but I think this is a bit far fetched currently. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com