On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:06 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Ah, Linus already pulled the series in. Next time then.) > > Yeah sorry, I was a bit stressed by a big mail backlog and also a bit > infatuated with my new b4 tool. > > Is it fine to fix any remaining issues with extra patches? I see. No worries. Andy did a good work fixing the indentations. But that caused the 80 chars line rule violation in some cases. The best way would be to avoid the rule violation in the first place, though sometimes it's just impossible without weakening the code readability. I suggested to fix some of the issues by reducing the error messages length and in another case just to remove the no-op &-operation. So If there were following up patches with fixes it would have been great. Though since we have got a violation for several chars in just a few lines of code, we can leave with that for now. So if Andy doesn't have a time to send the followup patches, I'll do this sometime later in the framework of my next patchset. Regards, -Sergey > > Yours, > Linus Walleij