pt., 28 lut 2020 o 23:33 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > GPIO descriptors are freed by consumers using gpiod_put(). The name of > > this function suggests some reference counting is going on but it's not > > true. > > > > Use kref to actually introduce reference counting for gpio_desc objects. > > Add a corresponding gpiod_get() helper for increasing the reference count. > > > > This doesn't change anything for already existing (correct) drivers but > > allows us to keep track of GPIO descs used by multiple users. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm having some trouble figuring out if we might be reinventing > a wheel here. > > A while back there was a proposed patch to add device links > between GPIO producers and consumers, so that a GPIO > chip won't be dropped while there are active consumers. > > (I don't remember who sent the patch.) > > We have a similar functionality in pin control if the > .link_consumers property is set on the pincontrol device. > I was thinking about making that compulsory at one point. > > The device links use a kref already existing in struct > device and would in this case be the kref in the struct > device for the struct gpio_device. > > So if that existed, gpiod_ref could just grab another > device_link_add(). > I was always under the impression that device links are aimed mostly at runtime PM. > Maybe we should just add device links between all > GPIO consumers (devices) and struct gpio_device:s > struct device and implement it like this so we don't > have to back out of this later? > > C.f. commit > commit 036f394dd77f8117346874151793ec38967d843f > pinctrl: Enable device link creation for pin control > Yes, definitely looks like it's done with PM in mind. Maybe we should do what nvmem does? Define a struct device_type for GPIO chips with an appropriate release() callback and use get_device() and put_device()? Although nvmem seems to use kref for cells and device reference counting somewhat separately - maybe that's something to address too. > (...) > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct gpio_descs *__must_check gpiod_get_array(struct device *dev, > > struct gpio_descs *__must_check gpiod_get_array_optional(struct device *dev, > > const char *con_id, > > enum gpiod_flags flags); > > +struct gpio_desc *gpiod_ref(struct gpio_desc *desc); > > void gpiod_put(struct gpio_desc *desc); > > void gpiod_put_array(struct gpio_descs *descs); > > You forgot to add a stub for the case where GPIOLIB is not > compiled in I think? (Lower in the same file.) > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Yeah this is fixed in the next version (with a different subject since it no longer concerns nvmem that much). Bart