On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > GPIO descriptors are freed by consumers using gpiod_put(). The name of > this function suggests some reference counting is going on but it's not > true. > > Use kref to actually introduce reference counting for gpio_desc objects. > Add a corresponding gpiod_get() helper for increasing the reference count. > > This doesn't change anything for already existing (correct) drivers but > allows us to keep track of GPIO descs used by multiple users. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I'm having some trouble figuring out if we might be reinventing a wheel here. A while back there was a proposed patch to add device links between GPIO producers and consumers, so that a GPIO chip won't be dropped while there are active consumers. (I don't remember who sent the patch.) We have a similar functionality in pin control if the .link_consumers property is set on the pincontrol device. I was thinking about making that compulsory at one point. The device links use a kref already existing in struct device and would in this case be the kref in the struct device for the struct gpio_device. So if that existed, gpiod_ref could just grab another device_link_add(). Maybe we should just add device links between all GPIO consumers (devices) and struct gpio_device:s struct device and implement it like this so we don't have to back out of this later? C.f. commit commit 036f394dd77f8117346874151793ec38967d843f pinctrl: Enable device link creation for pin control (...) > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct gpio_descs *__must_check gpiod_get_array(struct device *dev, > struct gpio_descs *__must_check gpiod_get_array_optional(struct device *dev, > const char *con_id, > enum gpiod_flags flags); > +struct gpio_desc *gpiod_ref(struct gpio_desc *desc); > void gpiod_put(struct gpio_desc *desc); > void gpiod_put_array(struct gpio_descs *descs); You forgot to add a stub for the case where GPIOLIB is not compiled in I think? (Lower in the same file.) Yours, Linus Walleij