Hi Geert, Many thanks for the series upgrade. A few static-analysis findings below (could be false positives). On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:42:51AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: [..] > +static bool isrange(const char *s) > +{ > + size_t n = strlen(s); Cppcheck 1.40-18521-ge6d692d96058: drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c:69:11: style: Variable 'n' is assigned a value that is never used. [unreadVariable] Smatch v0.5.0-6150-gc1ed13e4ee7b: drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c:69 isrange() warn: unused return: n = strlen() [..] > + aggr->lookups->dev_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.%d", DRV_NAME, id); > + if (!aggr->lookups) { > + res = -ENOMEM; > + goto remove_idr; > + } s/aggr->lookups/aggr->lookups->dev_id/ ? [..] > +static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask, > + unsigned long *bits) > +{ > + struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + unsigned long *values, flags; gcc 9.2.1: warning: ‘flags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] [..] > +static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask, > + unsigned long *bits) > +{ > + struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + unsigned long *values, flags; gcc 9.2.1, same as above: warning: ‘flags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] Should these be silenced like in 2bf593f101f3ca ("xilinx_uartps.c: suppress "may be used uninitialised" warning") ? I plan to do some runtime testing soon. -- Best Regards, Eugeniu