On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:39 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:40:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:30 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Linus, I think it would be good if we have first 3 (okay, I noticed you have > > > pushed first one to your devel branch) patches to go to v5.4. It will reduce > > > dependency burden in v5.5. > > > > At this point in the kernel release cycle I can really only apply > > patches for serious regressions. That's the policy I need to keep > > to. > > > > It also causes a problem if I put dependencies on Torvald's > > tree this late in the kernel cycle, because I need to get the > > changes back into my tree in order to base new stuff on them. > > I can't really do that until he releases an -rc that I can merge > > back. > > > > At this point I'd maybe have to merge back v5.4 and that doesn't > > feel good at all. > > > > So far I applied patches 1 & 2 for v5.5. > > Thanks! Does it mean that the rest is material for v5.6? No, if they work for you and Hans both I have 100% trust in you guys so just send me a big pull request for all of it for v5.5. Besides Torvalds is talking about an -rc8 this next weekend. Please base your pull request on my "devel" branch though, since I already applied some of the patches (sorry for the mess!) We can certainly hash out any remaining nits during the v5.5 kernel cycle. Yours, Linus Walleij