Re: [RESEND][PATCH v2 0/7] gpiolib: fix GPIO <-> pin mapping registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:39 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:40:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 6:30 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Linus, I think it would be good if we have first 3 (okay, I noticed you have
> > > pushed first one to your devel branch) patches to go to v5.4. It will reduce
> > > dependency burden in v5.5.
> >
> > At this point in the kernel release cycle I can really only apply
> > patches for serious regressions. That's the policy I need to keep
> > to.
> >
> > It also causes a problem if I put dependencies on Torvald's
> > tree this late in the kernel cycle, because I need to get the
> > changes back into my tree in order to base new stuff on them.
> > I can't really do that until he releases an -rc that I can merge
> > back.
> >
> > At this point I'd maybe have to merge back v5.4 and that doesn't
> > feel good at all.
> >
> > So far I applied patches 1 & 2 for v5.5.
>
> Thanks! Does it mean that the rest is material for v5.6?

No, if they work for you and Hans both I have 100% trust in you
guys so just send me a big pull request for all of it for v5.5.
Besides Torvalds is talking about an -rc8 this next weekend.

Please base your pull request on my "devel" branch though,
since I already applied some of the patches (sorry for the mess!)

We can certainly hash out any remaining nits during the v5.5
kernel cycle.

Yours,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux