Hi Andy, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:08:39 +0200: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:02 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2019 > > 09:06:37 +0200: > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:33 PM Uwe Kleine-König > > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > For me it sounds more likely that PWM is a *pin function* of a pin > > > controller and actually this GPIO driver should be a pin controller > > > with corresponding function(s). > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the input, I will address Thierry's comments and > > re-submit as a single file (same shape as in v1). > > Perhaps I have to be more clear. What I meant is that pin control > should support PWM pin function and PCA953x be converted to a pin > control + GPIO + PWM. > Above definitely is not what you did and it's not for immediate submission. Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was answering Uwe. > I really would like to hear if it makes sense. While this would probably be the nicest and cleanest solution, I don't think it is doable in a reasonable amount of time compared to the benefits. Thanks, Miquèl