On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:02 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2019 > 09:06:37 +0200: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:33 PM Uwe Kleine-König > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For me it sounds more likely that PWM is a *pin function* of a pin > > controller and actually this GPIO driver should be a pin controller > > with corresponding function(s). > > > > Ok, thanks for the input, I will address Thierry's comments and > re-submit as a single file (same shape as in v1). Perhaps I have to be more clear. What I meant is that pin control should support PWM pin function and PCA953x be converted to a pin control + GPIO + PWM. Above definitely is not what you did and it's not for immediate submission. I really would like to hear if it makes sense. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko