On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:06:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There is a logical continuation of the commit 5fbe5b5883f8 ("gpio: Initialize
> the irqchip valid_mask with a callback") to split IRQ initialization to
> hardware and valid mask setup parts.
>
Hans, it will be nice if you would be able to test this as well.
The better is to use our for-next branch with this applied on top.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: baytrail: Move IRQ valid mask initialization to a dedicated callback
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: baytrail: Move IRQ valid mask initialization to a dedicated callback
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 19:07:40 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20191025140621.43417-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20191025140621.43417-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
- References:
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: baytrail: Move IRQ valid mask initialization to a dedicated callback
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: baytrail: Move IRQ valid mask initialization to a dedicated callback
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] led: bd71828: Support LED outputs on ROHM BD71828 PMIC
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: brcm: Add bindings for xgs-iproc
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: baytrail: Move IRQ valid mask initialization to a dedicated callback
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: baytrail: Move IRQ valid mask initialization to a dedicated callback
- Index(es):
 |