Re: [PATCH V6 01/21] irqchip: tegra: Do not disable COP IRQ during suspend

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>]

22.07.2019 13:13, Marc Zyngier пишет:
> On 22/07/2019 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 21.07.2019 22:40, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>> Tegra210 platforms use sc7 entry firmware to program Tegra LP0/SC7 entry
>>> sequence and sc7 entry firmware is run from COP/BPMP-Lite.
>>>
>>> So, COP/BPMP-Lite still need IRQ function to finish SC7 suspend sequence
>>> for Tegra210.
>>>
>>> This patch has fix for leaving the COP IRQ enabled for Tegra210 during
>>> interrupt controller suspend operation.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c
>>> index e1f771c72fc4..851f88cef508 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static unsigned int num_ictlrs;
>>>  
>>>  struct tegra_ictlr_soc {
>>>  	unsigned int num_ictlrs;
>>> +	bool supports_sc7;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  static const struct tegra_ictlr_soc tegra20_ictlr_soc = {
>>> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ static const struct tegra_ictlr_soc tegra30_ictlr_soc = {
>>>  
>>>  static const struct tegra_ictlr_soc tegra210_ictlr_soc = {
>>>  	.num_ictlrs = 6,
>>> +	.supports_sc7 = true,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  static const struct of_device_id ictlr_matches[] = {
>>> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ictlr_matches[] = {
>>>  
>>>  struct tegra_ictlr_info {
>>>  	void __iomem *base[TEGRA_MAX_NUM_ICTLRS];
>>> +	const struct tegra_ictlr_soc *soc;
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>>  	u32 cop_ier[TEGRA_MAX_NUM_ICTLRS];
>>>  	u32 cop_iep[TEGRA_MAX_NUM_ICTLRS];
>>> @@ -147,8 +150,20 @@ static int tegra_ictlr_suspend(void)
>>>  		lic->cop_ier[i] = readl_relaxed(ictlr + ICTLR_COP_IER);
>>>  		lic->cop_iep[i] = readl_relaxed(ictlr + ICTLR_COP_IEP_CLASS);
>>>  
>>> -		/* Disable COP interrupts */
>>> -		writel_relaxed(~0ul, ictlr + ICTLR_COP_IER_CLR);
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * AVP/COP/BPMP-Lite is the Tegra boot processor.
>>> +		 *
>>> +		 * Tegra210 system suspend flow uses sc7entry firmware which
>>> +		 * is executed by COP/BPMP and it includes disabling COP IRQ,
>>> +		 * clamping CPU rail, turning off VDD_CPU, and preparing the
>>> +		 * system to go to SC7/LP0.
>>> +		 *
>>> +		 * COP/BPMP wakes up when COP IRQ is triggered and runs
>>> +		 * sc7entry-firmware. So need to keep COP interrupt enabled.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		if (!lic->soc->supports_sc7)
>>> +			/* Disable COP interrupts if SC7 is not supported */
>>
>> All Tegra SoCs support SC7, hence the 'supports_sc7' and the comment
>> doesn't sound correct to me. Something like 'firmware_sc7' should suit
>> better here.
> 
> If what you're saying is true, then the whole patch is wrong, and the
> SC7 property should come from DT.

It should be safe to assume that all of existing Tegra210 devices use
the firmware for SC7, hence I wouldn't say that the patch is entirely
wrong. To me it's not entirely correct.

>>
>>> +			writel_relaxed(~0ul, ictlr + ICTLR_COP_IER_CLR);
>>
>> Secondly, I'm also not sure why COP interrupts need to be disabled for
>> pre-T210 at all, since COP is unused. This looks to me like it was
>> cut-n-pasted from downstream kernel without a good reason and could be
>> simply removed.
> 
> Please verify that this is actually the case. Tegra-2 definitely needed
> some level of poking, and I'm not keen on changing anything there until
> you (or someone else) has verified it on actual HW (see e307cc8941fc).

Tested on Tegra20 and Tegra30, LP1 suspend-resume works perfectly fine
with all COP bits removed from the driver.

AFAIK, the reason why downstream needed that disabling is that it uses
proprietary firmware which is running on the COP and that firmware is
usually a BLOB audio/video DEC-ENC driver which doesn't cleanup
interrupts after itself. That firmware is not applicable for the
upstream kernel, hence there is no need to care about it.

> Joseph, can you please shed some light here?