Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: em: remove the gpiochip before removing the irq domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



G'day Bartosz,

One comment below

On 10/07/2019 17:08, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

In commit 8764c4ca5049 ("gpio: em: use the managed version of
gpiochip_add_data()") we implicitly altered the ordering of resource
freeing: since gpiochip_remove() calls gpiochip_irqchip_remove()
internally, we now can potentially use the irq_domain after it was
destroyed in the remove() callback (as devm resources are freed after
remove() has returned).

Use devm_add_action() to keep the ordering right and entirely kill
the remove() callback in the driver.

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 8764c4ca5049 ("gpio: em: use the managed version of gpiochip_add_data()")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c
index b6af705a4e5f..c88028ac66f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-em.c
@@ -259,6 +259,13 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops em_gio_irq_domain_ops = {
  	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
  };
+static void em_gio_irq_domain_remove(void *data)
+{
+	struct irq_domain *domain = data;
+
+	irq_domain_remove(domain);
+}
+
  static int em_gio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	struct em_gio_priv *p;
@@ -333,39 +340,32 @@ static int em_gio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		return -ENXIO;
  	}
+ ret = devm_add_action(&pdev->dev,
+			      em_gio_irq_domain_remove, p->irq_domain);

Could devm_add_action_or_reset be used?

+	if (ret) {
+		irq_domain_remove(p->irq_domain);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
  	if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq[0]->start,
  			     em_gio_irq_handler, 0, name, p)) {
  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request low IRQ\n");
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto err1;
+		return -ENOENT;
  	}
if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq[1]->start,
  			     em_gio_irq_handler, 0, name, p)) {
  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request high IRQ\n");
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto err1;
+		return -ENOENT;
  	}
ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, gpio_chip, p);
  	if (ret) {
  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add GPIO controller\n");
-		goto err1;
+		return ret;
  	}
return 0;
-
-err1:
-	irq_domain_remove(p->irq_domain);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static int em_gio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	struct em_gio_priv *p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-
-	irq_domain_remove(p->irq_domain);
-	return 0;
  }
static const struct of_device_id em_gio_dt_ids[] = {
@@ -376,7 +376,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, em_gio_dt_ids);
static struct platform_driver em_gio_device_driver = {
  	.probe		= em_gio_probe,
-	.remove		= em_gio_remove,
  	.driver		= {
  		.name	= "em_gio",
  		.of_match_table = em_gio_dt_ids,



--
Regards
Phil Reid




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux