Re: [PATCH v11 2/8] mfd: bd70528: Support ROHM bd70528 PMIC - core

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> > > ROHM. Also, I am not terribly excited about the option of changing this
> > > back to function-pointer as I already removed the pointer from parent
> > > data and this changed parent data is already adapted to all sub drivers
> > > - so this is all just babbling. Maybe it is just my huge ego shouting
> > > there - 'I was right, I must have the final say'.
> > 
> > No, a call-back function would be a back-step.
> 
> You are probably right.
> 
> > Ego or no ego, you're wrong. =:-D
> 
> I'd rephrase that as "It's not that I am wrong, but you are right." =)

Works for me.

> > > As a side note, I already did submit v12 with other styling fixes but
> > > which left the WDT function in MFD. If you still see the WDT functions
> > > should be exported from WDT - then please ignore the v12. I'll do v13
> > > at the afternoon (my time, which is only a bit after noon your time I
> > > guess) which will export these functions from WDT. (Well, I had to try
> > > once more :D)
> > 
> > Please keep the WDT code in the WDT driver.  Create a little stub for
> > the cases where the WDT driver is not enabled - job done.
> 
> Yes Sir.

=;-)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog