Re: [PATCH v11 2/8] mfd: bd70528: Support ROHM bd70528 PMIC - core

[Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Lee,

Thanks for taking a look on this again =) I agree with most of the
comments and correct them at next version.

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:31:52AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > ROHM BD70528MWV is an ultra-low quiescent current general
> > purpose single-chip power management IC for battery-powered
> > portable devices.
> > 
> > Add MFD core which enables chip access for following subdevices:
> > 	- regulators/LED drivers
> > 	- battery-charger
> > 	- gpios
> > 	- 32.768kHz clk
> > 	- RTC
> > 	- watchdog
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + * Mapping of main IRQ register bits to sub irq register offsets so
> 
> "sub-IRQ"
> 
> > + * that we can access corect sub IRQ registers based on bits that
> 
> "sub IRQ" is also fine, but please standardise.
> 
> I do prefer "sub-IRQ" though.

I'll go with "sub-IRQ" then

> > +
> > +#define WD_CTRL_MAGIC1 0x55
> > +#define WD_CTRL_MAGIC2 0xAA
> > +/**
> > + * bd70528_wdt_set - arm or disarm watchdog timer
> > + *
> > + * @data:	device data for the PMIC instance we want to operate on
> > + * @enable:	new state of WDT. zero to disable, non zero to enable
> > + * @old_state:	previous state of WDT will be filled here
> > + *
> > + * Arm or disarm WDT on BD70528 PMIC. Expected to be called only by
> > + * BD70528 RTC and BD70528 WDT drivers. The rtc_timer_lock must be taken
> > + * by calling bd70528_wdt_lock before calling bd70528_wdt_set.
> > + */
> > +int bd70528_wdt_set(struct rohm_regmap_dev *data, int enable, int *old_state)
> 
> Why doesn't this reside in the watchdog driver?

If my memory serves me right we shortly discussed this already during v8
review ;) Cant blame you though as I have seen some of the mail traffic
going through your inbox :D

The motivation to have the functions exported from MFD is to not create
sirect dependency between RTC and WDT. There may be cases where we want
to leave either RTC or WDT out of compilation. MFD is always needed so
the dependency from MFD to RTC/WDT does not harm.

(Here's some discussion necromancy if you are interested in re-reading
how we did end up with this implementation:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190212091723.GZ20638@dell/)

I hope you are still Ok with having the WDT control functions in MFD.

Best Regards
    Matti Vaittinen

-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~