Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings

[Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>]

On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
> 
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
> 
> Rob
> 

Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.

Regards,
Amelie