Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings

[Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.

Rob