On 11/20/2018 2:22 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 13/11/18 7:20 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Since commit eb3744a2dd01 ("gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous
IRQ numbering") the davinci GPIO driver fails to probe if we boot
in legacy mode from any of the board files. Since the driver now
expects every interrupt to be defined as a separate resource, split
the definition in devices-da8xx.c instead of having a single continuous
interrupt range.
Fixes: eb3744a2dd01 ("gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
There are a number of other boards that need such fixing too. And the
commit in question does not do a good job of explaining why it was
needed in the first place. The description just repeats what can be
inferred by reading the patch.
Cc Lokesh
Sekhar,
DT explicitly mentions every IRQ number. The patch in discussion
explicitly calls platform_get_irq for all the interrupts which to me is
the right thing to do as: platform_get_irq-->
of_irq_get-->irq_create_of_mapping--> sequence is to be done for every IRQ.
k3-am654 definitely will need explicit calls to platform_get_irq as it
will be involving interrupt router and interrupt numbers need not be
continuous.
So i do not think reverting the patch is the right idea.
Regards,
Keerthy
gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
in an array for later use.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Can we revert the offending commit instead?
Thanks,
Sekhar
