On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:00 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:25:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:43 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The parameter 'community' had been spelled incorrectly. > > > Fix it here. > > > > > > As a side effect it satisfies static checkers that issue > > > the following warnings: > > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:845: warning: Function parameter or member 'community' not described in 'intel_gpio_to_pin' > > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:845: warning: Excess function parameter 'commmunity' description in 'intel_gpio_to_pin' > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Patch does not apply on devel, I guess rebase and resend. > > Strange. Here is the same comment as per the other series... Probably my fault. Applied now. > > Andy if this persists, would you be willing to start collecting > > patches for Intel on a branch and send me pull requests instead? > > This is what we did for Renesas when it started to happen too > > much there. > > We discussed this with Mika and decide to follow your suggestion, for the next > (v4.21) cycle we would establish a tree (either on kernel.org or infradead.org) > and will do PR's for Intel GPIO and pin control stuff. I hope this will unload > you with our pile of slight mess. OK that would be great :) Hopefully it will also make it smoother and quicker for your changes. Yours, Linus Walleij