On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:25:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:43 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The parameter 'community' had been spelled incorrectly. > > Fix it here. > > > > As a side effect it satisfies static checkers that issue > > the following warnings: > > > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:845: warning: Function parameter or member 'community' not described in 'intel_gpio_to_pin' > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:845: warning: Excess function parameter 'commmunity' description in 'intel_gpio_to_pin' > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Patch does not apply on devel, I guess rebase and resend. Strange. Here is the same comment as per the other series... > There is just too much Intel stuff coming in right now, things > start clashing. Sadly I tend to agree with this. > Right now I have some merge conflicts between fixes and > devel that I need to sort out by merging in -rc6 after the weekend > (I hope that will solve things)... > > Andy if this persists, would you be willing to start collecting > patches for Intel on a branch and send me pull requests instead? > This is what we did for Renesas when it started to happen too > much there. We discussed this with Mika and decide to follow your suggestion, for the next (v4.21) cycle we would establish a tree (either on kernel.org or infradead.org) and will do PR's for Intel GPIO and pin control stuff. I hope this will unload you with our pile of slight mess. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko