On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:28:35PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Sergio Paracuellos > <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > Thanks for your time in reviewing this. > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 09:30:10AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > >>> Add a devicetree binding documentation for the mt7621 driver. > >> > > >>> + second cell specifies GPIO flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>. > >>> + Only the GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flags are supported. > >>> +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller. > >>> +- reg : The id of the bank that the node describes. > >> > >> I'd prefer to not have banks defined in DT. Do you have a variable > >> number or resources that are per bank? If not, then you don't need them. > > > > Mmmm, That's what I understood from documentation: > > > > "Some system-on-chips (SoCs) use the concept of GPIO banks. ... > > Usually each such bank is > > exposed in the device tree as an individual gpio-controller node. ..." > > This should be conditioned on being able to divide up the registers by > bank which seems like you can't. Or there's the case like the DW GPIO > block and the number of banks is configurable. I see. Thanks for clarifing this. > > > If this is not a good approach, could you please me point me out to a > > device tree example where > > the correct approach is being used? > > I'm not sure offhand. There are lots of examples of single nodes I'm > sure. Which ones have banks I haven't a clue. IIRC, there were some > cases where the bank # was part of the GPIO cells, but I seem to > recall Linus prefers not having 3 cells. Ok, so... does the following single node sounds acceptable? gpio: gpio@600 { #gpio-cells = <2>; #interrupt-cells = <2>; compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-gpio"; gpio-controller; interrupt-controller; reg = <0x600 0x60>; interrupt-parent = <&gic>; interrupts = <GIC_SHARED 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; mediatek,gpio-bank-widths = <32 32 32>; } Changing definition for "reg" and adding a new one for "mediatek,gpio-bank-widths" as follows: reg: Define the base and range of the address space containing the mediatek GPIO controller registers mediatek,gpio-bank-widths: Number of GPIO lines for each bank. Number of elements must correspond to number of banks suggested by the 'reg' property. Thanks in advance. > > Rob Best regards, Sergio Paracuellos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html