Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_port_word macro

[William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 06:06:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:26 PM, William Breathitt Gray
><vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This macro iterates for each group of bits (port word) with set bits,
>> within a bitmap memory region. For each iteration, "port_word" is set to
>> the found port word index, "word_index" is set to the word index of the
>> bitmap containing the found port word, and "word_offset" is set to the
>> bit offset of the found port word within the respective bitmap word.
>
>Isn't that idea we discussed some time ago?

That's right, I found the time to implement the macro suggestion you
made during the get_multiple/set_multiple patchset for the PC104 GPIO
drivers a while ago.

This macro greatly simplifies the callback function implementations in
those drivers and reduces the repeated code that kept appearing among
those drivers. Hopefully it can be useful for other drivers as well.

>
>In any case, part "port" is too specific for a generic function like
>this. Please, get rid of it completely. No-one knows what port means
>here. Just makes a lot of confusion.

Okay, I'll come up with a better name and submit a version 3 of this
patchset.

>
>> --- a/lib/find_bit.c
>> +++ b/lib/find_bit.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>>  #include <linux/export.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
>No need. It's included by bitmap.h IIRC.

Ah, you are correct, I'll remove this line then.

William Breathitt Gray

>
>
>-- 
>With Best Regards,
>Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html