On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 06:11:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:26 PM, William Breathitt Gray ><vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> While adding GPIO get_multiple/set_multiple callback support for various >> drivers, I noticed a pattern of looping manifesting that would be useful >> standardized as a macro. >> >> This patchset introduces the for_each_set_port_word macro and utilizes >> it in several GPIO drivers. The for_each_set_port_word macro facilitates >> a for-loop syntax that iterates over entire groups of set bits at a >> time. >> >> For example, suppose you would like to iterate over a 16-bit integer 4 >> bits at a time, skipping over 4-bit groups with no set bit, where XXXX >> represents the current 4-bit group: >> >> Example: 1011 1110 0000 1111 >> First loop: 1011 1110 0000 XXXX > >> Second loop: 1011 XXXX 0000 1111 > >8-bit itteration. Is it correct? This case is 4-bit iteration for the sake of example, but the idea is to have the for_each_set_port_word macro to be capable of 8-bit iteration, as well as any other number of bits, as specified by the port_size parameter. > >> Third loop: XXXX 1110 0000 1111 > >Looking at the example above I highly recommend to introduce some test >cases for your helper function. > >Consider extending lib/test_bitmap.c for this purpose. That's a good idea. I'll add in some test cases to lib/test_bitmap.c to help check the implementation of these functions and macro. William Breathitt Gray > >> >> Each iteration of the loop returns the next 4-bit group that has at >> least one set bit. >> >> The for_each_set_port_word macro has six parameters: >> >> * port_word: set to current port word index for the iteration >> * word_index: set to current bitmap word index for the iteration >> * word_offset: bits offset of the found port word in the bitmap word >> * bits: bitmap to search within >> * size: bitmap size in number of port words >> * port_size: port word size in number of bits >> >> The port_size argument can be an arbitrary number of bits and is not >> required to be a multiple of 2. >> >> I've called the group of bits a "port word" which may be a confusing >> naming convention; I was afraid calling that them a "group" may be too >> vague. Should a different name be chosen; what would you suggest? >> >> This patchset was rebased on top of the following three commits: >> >> * commit aaf96e51de11 ("gpio: pci-idio-16: Fix port memory offset for get_multiple callback") >> * commit 304440aa96c6 ("gpio: pcie-idio-24: Fix port memory offset for get_multiple/set_multiple callbacks") >> * commit e026646c178d ("gpio: pcie-idio-24: Fix off-by-one error in get_multiple loop") >> >> William Breathitt Gray >> >> William Breathitt Gray (7): >> bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_port_word macro >> gpio: 104-dio-48e: Utilize for_each_set_port_word macro >> gpio: 104-idi-48: Utilize for_each_set_port_word macro >> gpio: gpio-mm: Utilize for_each_set_port_word macro >> gpio: ws16c48: Utilize for_each_set_port_word macro >> gpio: pci-idio-16: Utilize for_each_set_port_word macro >> gpio: pcie-idio-24: Utilize for_each_set_port_word macro >> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c | 67 +++++--------------- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idi-48.c | 32 ++-------- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-gpio-mm.c | 67 +++++--------------- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pci-idio-16.c | 67 ++++++-------------- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcie-idio-24.c | 102 +++++++++++------------------- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-ws16c48.c | 66 +++++-------------- >> include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h | 26 ++++++++ >> include/linux/bitops.h | 9 +++ >> lib/find_bit.c | 28 ++++++++ >> 9 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 292 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.17.0 >> > > > >-- >With Best Regards, >Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html