Re: [PATCH][next][V2] pinctrl: actions: fix missing break in PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH case.

[Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:22:59PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> There is a missing break in case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH leading to
> a fall-through to the PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE case that performs different
> checks against *arg. This looks like an unintentional missing break so
> add in the break.
> 
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468456, 1468459 ("Missing break in switch")
>

Thanks for fixing!
 
> Fixes: 513d7a2f7e0f ("pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> 

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> index 928b40f71a3c..ee090697b1e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_arg2val(const struct owl_pingroup *g,
>  		default:
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> +		break;
>  	case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
>  		if (*arg)
>  			*arg = OWL_PINCONF_SLEW_FAST;
> @@ -441,6 +442,7 @@ static int owl_group_pinconf_val2arg(const struct owl_pingroup *g,
>  		default:
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> +		break;
>  	case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
>  		if (*arg)
>  			*arg = 1;
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html