On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 1:00 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The Pyra-Handheld originally used the tca6424 but recently we have > replaced it by the pin and package compatible pcal6524. So let's > add this to the bindings and the driver. > > And while we are at it, the pcal9555a does not have a compatible entry > either but is already supported by the device id table. > + { "pcal6524", 24 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_INT | PCA_PCAL, }, > { "pcal9555a", 16 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_INT | PCA_PCAL, }, So, from your description I can get that PCA_PCAL is redundant for 6524. Is it correct? What does L means in the model code? Perhaps we need to rename PCA_PCAL to be more specific? > + { .compatible = "nxp,pcal6524", .data = OF_953X(24, PCA_INT), }, > + { .compatible = "nxp,pcal9555a", .data = OF_953X(16, PCA_INT), }, Other way around, you missed PCA_PCAL in the second case. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html