Re: [PATCH] gpio: raspberrypi-ext: fix firmware dependency

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thanks for the fix.
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 02:48:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> When the firmware driver is a loadable module, the gpio driver cannot be
>> built-in:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_set':
>> gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0xb4): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_property'
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_get':
>> gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0x1ec): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_property'
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction':
>> gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0x360): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_property'
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity':
>> gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0x4d4): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_property'
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_dir_out':
>> gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0x670): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_property'
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o:gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0x7fc): more undefined references to `rpi_firmware_property' follow
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_dir_in':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.o: In function `rpi_exp_gpio_probe':
>> gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:(.text+0x93c): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_get'
>>
>> We already have a Kconfig dependency for it, but when compile-testing, it
>> is disregarded.
>>
>> This changes the dependency so that compile-testing is only done when the
>> firmware driver is completely disabled.
>
> What about the CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835=y case? The combination of
> CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP=y and CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=m is still
> valid. Wouldn't that break the build?
>
> Isn't there a way in Kconfig to force CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP=m when
> CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=m?

The problem I ran into only happens with CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835=y to
start with. My fix handles that case correctly, it forces
CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP to be either 'n' or 'm'
when CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=m.

> What about 'depends on m || RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=y'?

That would be (slightly) wrong, it would force CONFIG_GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP
to be 'm' even if RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=n.

> Grepping around I also found this:
>
> drivers/power/supply/Kconfig:   depends on USB_GADGET || !USB_GADGET # if USB_GADGET=m, this can't be 'y'

That is what I did here as well, except the !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
only applies for COMPILE_TEST.

> And this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig:     depends on m || IPV6 != m

This is a less common way to express it. The idiomatic
Kconfig expression here would be 'depends on IPV6 || !IPV6'.

>> Fixes: a98d90e7d588 ("gpio: raspberrypi-exp: Driver for RPi3 GPIO expander via mailbox service")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> index 2ecd2adbaec6..52a8b0a6f4e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config GPIO_RASPBERRYPI_EXP
>>       tristate "Raspberry Pi 3 GPIO Expander"
>>       default RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE
>>       depends on OF_GPIO
>> -     depends on (ARCH_BCM2835 && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) || COMPILE_TEST
>> +     depends on (ARCH_BCM2835 && RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) || (COMPILE_TEST && !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE)
>
> This is really non-obvious. An inline comment here might help, IMO.

How about

       # RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE is only available for ARCH_BCM2835, but we want to
       # allow compile-testing when it is disabled

?

       Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html