Am 21.02.2018 um 20:13 schrieb Andy Shevchenko: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam > <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Add gpio driver for Actions Semi OWL family S900 SoC. Set of registers >> controlling the gpio shares the same register range with pinctrl block. >> >> GPIO registers are organized as 6 banks and each bank controls the >> maximum of 32 gpios. > >> +static void owl_gpio_set_reg(void __iomem *base, unsigned int pin, int flag) >> +{ >> + u32 val; >> + >> + if (flag) { >> + val = readl(base); >> + val |= BIT(pin); >> + writel(val, base); >> + } else { >> + val = readl(base); >> + val &= ~BIT(pin); >> + writel(val, base); >> + } >> +} > > Why not to use the same pattern as below? > > readl() > if () > ... > else > ... > writel() > > ? And shouldn't that be readl_relaxed() and writel_relaxed()? Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html