Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI / utils: Introduce acpi_dev_get_dev_name()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 18:47 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> On 01/04/2018 10:47 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Sometimes the user want to have device name of the match rather than
> > just checking if device present or not. To make life easier for such
> > users introduce acpi_dev_get_dev_name() helper based on code for
> > acpi_dev_present().
> > 
> > To be more consistent with the purpose rename
> > 
> >    struct acpi_dev_present_info  -> struct acpi_dev_match_info
> >    acpi_dev_present_cb()         -> acpi_dev_match_cb()
> > 
> > in the utils.c file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This works fine on a Dell 5585 where the default codec dai name needs
> to 
> be updated based on the actual HID information, so
> Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

Is this only for patch 1, or for both 1 and 2 ?

> the next patch does not apply directly however, and needs additional 
> changes for the ES8316 machine driver. see the changes here: 
> https://github.com/plbossart/sound/tree/topic/bytcht-acpi-fixes

You mean because of this
https://github.com/plbossart/sound/commit/2416827fa6d221b27edd6397f17daa
a1f3cd5fb0
?

I.e. I need to rebase on top of your series.

> It's probably best to let this patch go through the acpi tree, and
> the 
> next one through Mark's tree once the first is merged and all the
> other 
> Kconfig/acpi stuff is also in -next?

It wouldn't prevent to push patch 3 as well via linux-pm at the same
time as patch 1.

Linus, do you have any objection on that?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html