On 2017/12/18 0:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> [171217 05:43]:
On 2017/12/15 0:51, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Pinctrl single should just show how many pins were found, the physical
address is already in the dev information. So let's remove the wrong
information that claims to show the physical address but really prints
a virtual address that is now hashed.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1774,8 +1774,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_warn(pcs->dev, "initialized with no interrupts\n");
}
- dev_info(pcs->dev, "%i pins at pa %p size %u\n",
- pcs->desc.npins, pcs->base, pcs->size);
+ dev_info(pcs->dev, "%i pins, size %u\n", pcs->desc.npins, pcs->size);
return pinctrl_enable(pcs->pctl);
Hi Tony,
If there's only one pinctrl region in SoC, it's fine to remove the pa part.
But there're always multiple pinctrl regions in Hisilicon SoCs. It causes
multiple pinctrl register bases are used. Will it cause debug information
harder to read when pa parts are removed?
I doubt as for years now we've been printing out the va instead of pa
and so far nobody noticed :) We still get the real device pa with the
dev_info, size and number of pins.
OK
Regards
Haojian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
