On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 09:21:48PM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 06:01:27PM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote: > >> Hi Mika, > >> Here's the full dmesg log you need. The touchpad stop reporting at > >> the last of the log. > >> https://gist.github.com/mschiu77/a0b8d24a586a228c55eca30c87c71d41 > > > > Thanks! > > > > I did not spot anything suspicious in the i2c-hid initialization. When > > the issue happens, can you check what the pin state is and if it changes > > when you use the touchpad? If I read your ACPI tables right, something > > like this: > > > > # grep GPIO_18 /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3452:00/pins > > > > (it could be another INT3452:* device as well). > > > > The GPIO line should be high and when the touchpad is pressed it should > > go low. > > > > Then another thing, if you unload i2c-hid and load it back, does it > > start working again? > > > > # modprobe -r i2c-hid > > # modprobe i2c-hid > > Yup. We did the same inspection on /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3452:00/pins > before and after the touchpad stop working. > Before touchpad stop working, most of the results would be > pin 18 (GPIO_18) GPIO 0x40900102 0x00024075 > After touchpad stop working, the result would always be > pin 18 (GPIO_18) GPIO 0x40900100 0x00024075 OK, so the line (as being active low) gets pulled to low and is never released back. Does /proc/interrupts show that the interrupt counts are still increasing (for both the GPIO driver and the touchpad)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html