On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:12 PM, Keerthy wrote: > Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the > return value appropriately. Linus, Any comments on this? Sorry if i pinged too soon. The rest 2 of this series were pulled by you. So just wanted to check on this one if you had specific comments. Regards, Keerthy > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c > index 27499ec..d6fb1ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c > @@ -237,7 +237,10 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err; > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips); > - davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev); > + ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev); > + if (ret) > + goto err; > + > return 0; > > err: > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html