On 07/26/2017 09:20 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > On 07/26/2017 08:36 AM, Keerthy wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 26 July 2017 06:57 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 07/26/2017 08:00 AM, Suman Anna wrote: >>>> Hi Keerthy, >>>> >>>> On 07/26/2017 01:45 AM, Keerthy wrote: >>>>> The patch adds keystone-k2g compatible, specific properties and >>>>> an example. >>> >>> Seems we are adding information regarding several Keystone 2 SoCs. So >>> the commit and subject should be tweaked to reflect this. >> >> Okay i can add that as well. >> >>>> >>>> Please update patch header to "dt-bindings: gpio: davinci: ...." >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v3: >>>>> >>>>> * Added details about family of SoCs corresponding to compatibles. >>>>> >>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt >>>>> index 5079ba7..fb9efee 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt >>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ >>>>> Davinci/Keystone GPIO controller bindings >>>>> >>>>> Required Properties: >>>>> -- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio" >>>>> +- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio": for Davinci da850 SoCs >>>>> + "ti,keystone-gpio": for Keystone 2 66AK2H/K, 66AK2L, >>>>> + 66AK2E SoCs >>>>> + "ti,keystone-k2g-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio": for 66AK2G >>>>> >>>>> - reg: Physical base address of the controller and the size of memory mapped >>>>> registers. >>>>> @@ -26,6 +29,17 @@ The GPIO controller also acts as an interrupt controller. It uses the default >>>>> two cells specifier as described in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ >>>>> interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt. >>>>> >>>>> +Required Properties specific to keystone-k2g >>>> >>>> Thanks for updating the binding for the clocks, but clocks are not >>>> specific to K2G. They also apply to other K2 SoCs. Davinci platforms do >>>> not have DT clocks atm, so the Davinci portion can be updated later if >>>> and when they get added. >>>> >>> >>> What about power-domain property? > > The correct name is "power-domains". > >> Driver has no pm_runtime implemented yet. > > True, not yet, but this is in general a required property on K2G SoCs to > automatically enable clocks through runtime_pm. Clock properties on K2G > nodes should only be truly required if a driver is using clk API > (ideally to control optional clocks or for adjusting clock frequencies). > When the gpio-davinci driver gets updated to use pm_runtime, the clock > properties will be rendered obsolete for K2G. Now I understand better when we do or do not need this property after some offline discussion. If the driver doesn't support pm_runtime then no point in adding this property. Binding should discuss how to use the current driver. Not how a feature that may never exist may possibly be used. > > Rob, > Any suggestions on how we need to handle this? Should we be adding the > property now or later when we adapt the driver for runtime_pm? This > would be a common theme for K2G nodes that are reusing Davinci drivers. > > My take on this would be to add the property now, and mark the clock > properties obsolete when the driver gets converted. > > regards > Suman > >> >>> >>>>> + >>>>> +- clocks: Should contain devices input clock. The first parameter >>>>> + is a handle to k2g_clks. The second parameter is the >>>>> + device ID and the third parameter is the clock ID. One can >>>>> + refer: http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/TISCI#66AK2G02_Data >>>> >>>> No need for this link here, just refer to the appropriate clock >>>> bindings. Some thing like the following would be better >>> >>> This information is helpful especially with the macros being dropped. >>> However, I agree that this is not the place for this information. >>> Probably should be linked to in the ti,sci-clk.txt and >>> sci-pm-domain.txt. However, both of these are outdated since it is >>> referring to macros and includes that don't exist or will no longer exist. >> >> Hence included here but yes i can point to something like what Suman >> asked me to. >> >>> >>>> >>>> - clocks: Should contain the device's input clock, and >>>> should be defined as per the appropriate clock >>>> bindings consumer usage in, >>>> >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/keystone-gate.txt >>>> for 66AK2HK/66AK2L/66AK2E SoCs or, >>>> >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti,sci-clk.txt >>>> for 66AK2G SoCs >>>> >>>>> + >>>>> + Example: <&k2g_clks 0x001c 0x0>; >>>> >>>> This can be dropped as well, below example already demonstrates it. >>>> >>>>> + >>>>> +- clock-names: The driver expects the clock name to be "gpio"; >>>> >>>> Just say, Should be "gpio". No need of mentioning about the driver. >>>> >>>>> + >>>>> Example: >>>>> >>>>> gpio: gpio@1e26000 { >>>>> @@ -60,3 +74,27 @@ leds { >>>>> ... >>>>> }; >>>>> }; >>>>> + >>>>> +Example for keystone-k2g: >>>> >>>> s/keystone-k2g/66AK2G/ >>>> >>>>> + >>>>> +gpio0: gpio@2603000 { >>>>> + compatible = "ti,keystone-k2g-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio"; >>>>> + reg = <0x02603000 0x100>; >>>>> + gpio-controller; >>>>> + #gpio-cells = <2>; >>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 432 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 433 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 434 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 435 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 436 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 437 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 438 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 439 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, >>>>> + <GIC_SPI 440 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; >>>>> + interrupt-controller; >>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>; >>>>> + ti,ngpio = <144>; >>>>> + ti,davinci-gpio-unbanked = <0>; >>>>> + clocks = <&k2g_clks 0x001b 0x0>; >>>>> + clock-names = "gpio"; >>>>> +}; >>> >>> If your going to talk about other Keystone 2 devices it would be helpful >>> to include an example for one of them since they have slightly different >>> properties. >> >> Sure. >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> regards >>>> Suman >>>> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html