On Thursday 20 July 2017 12:14 PM, Keerthy wrote: > > > On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:14PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: >>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the >>> return value appropriately. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c >>> index 2c88054..932f270 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c >>> @@ -233,15 +233,23 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank]; >>> >>> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chips->chip, chips); >>> + if (ret) >>> + goto err; >>> + >>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips); >>> + ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev); >>> if (ret) { >>> - ctrl_num = 0; >>> - bank_base = 0; >>> - return ret; >>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); >>> + goto err; >>> } >>> >>> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips); >>> - davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev); >>> return 0; >> >> There's a separate but related bug here too as the clk_prepare_enable() >> in davinci_gpio_irq_setup() is never balanced on driver unbind. > > Yes Johan. I will send that as a separate patch. This is already fixed in the latest kernel: commit 6dc0048cff988858254fcc26becfc1e9753efa79 Author: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue May 23 14:48:57 2017 +0530 Regards, Keerthy > >> >> Johan >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html