Re: [PATCH fixes v3] pinctrl: Really force states during suspend/resume

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/29/2017 02:17 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> So if it is not desireable to have every driver know which exact
>> state it came from like S3 this or S2 that and on this laptop
>> we have S2' which is slightly different and such mess (that you
>> predict IIUC) what we really need to know is pretty simple:
>> did the hardware loose its state or not?
>
> That information is inherently platform specific though, so on platforms
> where pinctrl-single is used, you won't necessarily know whether the
> state should be restored (conversely saved) so maybe that means we
> should have the possibility for a platform to define a wrapper around
> pinctrl-single whose purpose is to implement platform specific
> suspend/r/resume functions and just that really? Is there such a driver
> already that uses pinctrl-single more as a "library" than anything else?

pinctrl-single maye not be the easiest in cases like this, but Tony
et al have bolted in a few OMAP specifics to pinctrl-single in the
past so I don't see why this would be a problem.

commit 02e483f66deb6bd8df6af450726574614eb53be3
"pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features"
etc.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html